Plan with 11-cent gas tax increase advances

By Cooper Inveen WNPA Olympia Bureau Just 18 days after its initial unveiling, state Senate lawmakers have passed a $15 billion transportation package that includes an 11.7-cent increase to the state gas tax over the next three years. That package approved last week awaits action by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, where Majority Leader Pat Sullivan said that the proposal won't be considered until lawmakers address education funding, which they are under order from the state Supreme Court to substantially increase. "In the end, our goal is to pass a transportation budget,GÇ¥ Sullivan said. "But we can't do that until we get the operating side figured out.GÇ¥ For the senators who worked on the package for months, last week's vote is reason enough for excitement. "I feel like I can breathe a little sigh of relief, like being in the eye of the hurricane before having to take a breath and head back into the storm,GÇ¥ said Sen. Steve Hobbs, a Democrat from Lake Stevens. Among the senators voting for the proposal was Randi Becker, a Republican from Eatonville whose Second District constituency includes south Pierce County. Ten of the package's 11 bills have now passed in the Senate and are scheduled to be introduced to their respective committees in the House. The package's revenue bill passed 27-23 on March 2. The revenue bill would fund 16 years worth of transportation projects by increasing the state's 35.7 cents-per-gallon gas tax by five cents in July, 4.2 cents in July 2016 and another 2.5 cents in July 2017. That would bring Washington's combined state and federal gas tax to 67.6 cents-per-gallon, second-highest in the country behind Pennsylvania. Along with the gas tax increase, the revenue bill would also increase car-tab fees by $15 in the program's first year and then by an additional $8 in 2022. The classified skill examination fee for obtaining a commercial driver's license would increase from $100 to $250. The package would fund $8 billion in widening projects on I-405 east of Seattle, I-90 through the Snoqualmie Pass corridor and I-5 in Pierce County near Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) south of Tacoma. Another Pierce County project would extend State Route 167 to the Port of Tacoma, a boost to the shipping of goods that drew the praise of County Executive Pat McCarthy. "We will take the time to study the details, of course, but this is a very important and positive step,GÇ¥ McCarthy said. "Our (trade) competitors around the world are investing in their infrastructure, and we cannot afford to wait any longer. I am very encouraged by the Senate's progress." McCarthy praised the Senate for its bi-partisan work to complete SR-167 and address traffic congestion around JBLM. The Senate proposal calls for funding a new north-south I-395 corridor in Spokane and allocating $1.2 billion for completing the west side of the new Highway 520 bridge between Seattle and Bellevue. The package also includes some funding for rural transit, vanpools, bike paths, pedestrian walkways and highway safety. However, Republicans have fought to include a provision in the revenue bill that would move all of these funds to the state highway account if Governo Jay Inslee'or any other governor in the next 16 years'implements a low-carbon fuel standard. Committee staff have previously said that the language could be interpreted to also include any carbon emission reduction plans. The revenue bill cleared the Senate on March 2 with 19 Republicans and 8 Democrats voting in support. The corresponding spending bill also passed that day in a 41-to-8 vote. The package's eight policy bills were passed the week before on Feb. 27. While most of them received near-unanimous approval, two had the Senate split along party lines, illustrating that some aspects of the bipartisan package aren't bipartisan at all. SB 5990 has been a focus of controversy since the package was announced. The bill's original language would have moved all revenue generated from sales taxes on transportation projects out of the state's general fund and into the transportation fund. Democrats and education groups opposed the bill, saying that moving money out of the general fund would only make it more difficult for the Legislature to meet its obligations for funding education. "We're under a contempt-of-court order for not funding our public schools, and I've heard over and over again that Senate Republicans don't want to raise revenue. But then they turn around and pass a gas tax,GÇ¥ Sullivan said. "They've shown that revenue isn't the problem. They're willing to do it for roads, and yet they're blocking that money for kids.GÇ¥ Instead, the Senate passed the bill with an amendment that exempts all highway projects from the state sales tax until July 1, 2019. All highway improvement and preservation projects beginning after that date would also be exempt. Sales tax revenue made off of non-highway related projects would still be moved out of the general fund and into the transportation budget. The bill passed 26-to-23. Sen. Tim Sheldon of Potlatch was the only Democrat to vote in support, and he sits with the Republican caucus. SB 5991, which passed 27-22, also had the Senate split along party lines. It would require 20 percent of funds from the state's environmental legacy stewardship account be given to the Department of Transportation to finance their own environmental projects. The account currently finances water and environmental health monitoring, air-quality programs, stormwater runoff reduction and hazardous waste management efforts, including oil spill cleanups. "There are several aspects of the package that are not favorable, but we will try to negotiate them out in the House,GÇ¥ Hobbs said. "So I think it's a good start. After two years we finally have something out of here.GÇ¥ Sullivan also has high hopes about the package's future. "I'm always optimistic,GÇ¥ he said. "We're not Washington, D.C. We'll find a compromise and get this done.GÇ¥

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment